June 2026 News: Worth-watching CASJE panel; day school, federation and Reform silence; lessons from eminent rabbis; Milwaukee study

|

I don’t need to tell you that there is an awful lot going on in the world that demands attention.

In the Jewish world, most of the attention understandably continues to focus on Israel/Iran/Palestine/Gaza and on antisemitism.

I can’t help but feel that in the Jewish world, almost no one wants to talk about engaging interfaith families. It may be lack of bandwidth – but I think there’s more to it. And it’s especially problematic at this time, when uncertainty about the ongoing status of 18Doors demands, in my opinion, a concerted effort to engage interfaith families.

This month there was one bright development, a panel discussion devoted to interfaith marriage offered by CASJE and co-sponsored by eJewishPhilanthropy.

But elsewhere – in the day school world, the federation world, and the Reform world – silence and missed opportunity.

CASJE Panel

Thank you to CASJE, the highly-regarded Collaborative for Applied Studies in Jewish Education, for sponsoring “Jewish–Interfaith Families and the Future of Jewish Life in the United States” with eJewishPhilanthropy on June 11. The last time there was a publicly advertised webinar on this subject was a long time ago.

The 200 people who registered for the program heard from Bruce Phillips and Ted Sasson on recent demographic shifts: Phillips said people with one Jewish parent will outnumber people with two Jewish parents by 2 to 1; Sasson said a high rate of interfaith marriage and a high retention rate (those who identify as Jews) result in a growing population. Keren McGinity spoke about the tenacity of gendered behavior and the need to integrate equal parenting into programming. Rabbi Shena Jaffe explained how Honeymoon Israel is having its deepest impact on partners from different faith backgrounds and those with one Jewish parent. Sophie Mortman described what 18Doors has learned about what drives interfaith family engagement. I encourage you to watch the complete program here, and to see the slides here.

Mortman said that 18Doors hoped to pivot to building a field of professionals, offering training and support, and helping to connect across organizations. In my closing remarks about next steps, which you can view separately here, I encouraged support for that effort, and renewed my call for a concerted effort to engage interfaith families.

But other than the CASJE program, as Bruce Philips said, interfaith marriage seems to have “dropped off the communal radar.”

The Day School World

Prizmah: Center for Jewish Day Schools issued a report, which JTA headlined as “Jewish day school enrollment is rising across denominations.” The increased enrollment was measured in community and Reform day schools, among others. I’m all in favor of day schools for those who chose them. But unless I missed it, the report said nothing at all about interfaith families sending their children to day schools – whether that accounted for any of the increase, or whether efforts have been made to increase representation from that population.

The Federation World

Shortly after the Prizmah study came out, eJP reported “Israeli government, JFNA partner on $66.7 million plan to boost Jewish day schools.” Gary Torgow, Jewish Federations of North America board chair, told eJP, “In recent years, formal Jewish education has become a growing focus for JFNA…. Jewish identity and Jewish education are key to the future of the Jewish people and combating antisemitism.” Torgow said October 7 and antisemitism “awakened something in the Jewish community” about the importance of Jewish education.

But my review of national and local Jewish community studies found that only 22% of interfaith families (compared to 51% of inmarried families) provide any K-12 Jewish education for their children. JFNA hasn’t said anything about any effort to increase that participation.

Around the same time, JFNA released “2026 LGBTQ+ Jewish Engagement Report.” eJP headlined this study as “JFNA survey finds LGBTQ+ Jews want more than just a Pride Shabbat dinner.” It’s a very interesting report, with findings about what LGBTQ+ Jews are looking for and respond to that are applicable to interfaith families as well.

But the report is silent about interfaith identities and relationships. The Executive Summary begins by referring to the post October 7 surge in Jewish engagement among “historically marginalized Jews, including LGBTQ+ Jews, Jews of Color, Jews with disabilities, and financially vulnerable Jews.” When JFNA preliminarily reported on surge data among historically marginalized groups, at the May 2025 Jewish Belonging Summit, it included data on interfaith families. Now they’ve stopped talking about it, not even mentioning it in this report.

The survey instrument shows that JFNA asked about racial and ethnic identity, and the report does talk about issues that LGBTQ+ Jews who are also Jews of color face. But the survey didn’t even ask respondents if they were in interfaith relationships. Bruce Phillips’ analysis of the 2020 Pew data shows that 77% of gay or lesbian Jews, compared to 43% of straight Jews, are in interfaith relationships. Doesn’t that huge intersectionality merit study and comment?

The Reform World

In April I wrote about an eJP essay by a URJ leader that referred to the “multiplicity of diverse Jewish identities” but did not mention diverse faith backgrounds. I said, “The leaders of the Reform movement seem to think that interfaith family inclusion is at the center of its work because it was pioneered by the movement, and that they have been successful at it, so they don’t need to talk about or prioritize doing anything about it.” That was also the case at the May 2026 Re-CHARGING Reform conference, where interfaith family engagement was not on the agenda, as I previously reported.

Now the URJ is holding a biennial in December. In February I submitted a proposal for a program session to be called, “Interfaith Marriage – Where Do We Stand?” with potential speakers including someone from 18Doors, myself, and someone on the URJ staff. This month I was told that my proposed session would not be included. I did not get a specific answer to my follow-up question, “is one of the 65 sessions going to be about interfaith family inclusion? Even in part?” I was told, “Interfaith families are the norm in Reform communities and inclusion of interfaith families is both a topic worthy of its own time and also part of every other conversation. It is fair to say that many sessions will be relevant.”

I am very glad that many interfaith families find welcoming and inclusive Reform congregations. I personally benefited from the movement making that happen, as have so many others. But I can’t agree that the movement doesn’t need to talk about or prioritize doing more about it. As I said in April, “only 13% of interfaith families belong to synagogues. I wouldn’t be satisfied with that level of success.” I agree that “inclusion of interfaith families is … a topic worthy of its own time,” but that discussion apparently will not happen.

* * * * *

All of this leaves me feeling like interfaith family engagement is being erased from the communal discussion, like it doesn’t matter. Over twenty-five years ago when I started InterfaithFamily, I spent a great deal of time debating with Jewish leaders who condemned interfaith marriage. Their policy response was to seek to discourage or reduce interfaith marriage, and not support any programming aimed to engage interfaith families. As a result, over those years, the concerted effort that I believe was necessary did not happen.

Today, thankfully, almost no one outside of the Orthodox world is condemning interfaith marriage. But there’s so much silence about it. And the result of the silence is the same as the result of the condemnation: engaging interfaith families is not prioritized.

In fairness, parts of the community are promising. 18Doors’ Adam Pollack just posted on LinkedIn about a study it is doing with one camp, and other camp partnerships that involve training and helping camps build communities of belonging for mixed-heritage families. But so much more needs to be done.

Learning from Rabbi Matalon, and Rabbi Dreskin

Andy Silow-Carroll had a very interesting interview with Rabbi Rolando Matalon as he retired from Manhattan’s B’nai Jeshurun, “one of the most influential synagogues in American Jewish life.” The congregation decided in 2017 that its clergy could officiate at interfaith weddings despite doing so being forbidden by the Conservative movement’s Rabbinical Assembly, which Rabbi Matalon left in 2018.

Rabbi Matalon’s explanation why he decided to officiate is well worth reading. He then describes his conditions:

If a couple commits to building a Jewish home, raising Jewish children, converting children when necessary through mikveh [ritual immersion] at an early age, and participating in Jewish community, then we would officiate. We would not perform a kiddushin, traditional ceremony, exactly as it had been done, but a modified ceremony. The couple also had to commit to a serious process of learning and engagement with the rabbi over nine months to a year, and at some point explicitly affirm their commitment to a Jewish home and Jewish child-rearing.

Rabbi Matalon is pleased with the decision because it “broadcast that BJ is a welcoming community that wants to engage people rather than push them away. At the same time, we didn’t eliminate standards or expectations altogether. We said: If you’re interested, come and let’s engage seriously.” I have to wonder if this could not be a solution for the Conservative movement as it continues to struggle with this issue.

Coincidentally, I only recently saw this October 2024 piece in which Rabbi Billy Dreskin, a senior Reform rabbi, explains why he changed a position in 2022. Previously, he would not officiate for a Jew and a person who practiced another religion and intended to in their home. Now he will; his explanation is well worth reading. He concludes, “I love Judaism. And I want it to continue to exist. The world needs it to continue to exist. But in this time of schism and toxic dissent, I love love even more so. And while I will always celebrate when two Jews marry, I won’t ever again stand in the way of two human beings promising to love and care for each other forever. In fact, I will respond to their request for officiation with a wholehearted and grateful, ‘Yes!’”

Milwaukee Jewish Community Study

A reminder that interfaith marriage isn’t going away: the Milwaukee Jewish Federation released its 2024-2025 community study, conducted by the Cohen Center at Brandeis. Consistent with our analysis of 26 other local community studies conducted since 2013, people in interfaith relationships feel less of a sense of belonging to the Jewish people or their local Jewish community than inmarried people.

  • 42% of intermarrieds (compared to 74% of inmarrieds) feel very much a sense of belonging to the Jewish people (p 61); the respective averages of 26 other communities are 25% and 47%.
  • 13% of intermarrieds (compared to 35% of inmarrieds) feel very much a sense of belonging to the Jewish community where they live (p 61); the respective averages of 26 other communities are 6% and 26%.
  • 17% of intermarrieds (compared to 35% of inmarrieds) feel very emotionally attached to Israel (a traditional measure of belonging) (p 94); the respective averages of 26 other communities are 20% and 40%.

With respect to Jewish behaviors, 22% of intermarrieds, compared to 49% of inmarrieds, were current members of Jewish congregations (p 47). The study does not report the percentage of intermarrieds compared to inmarrieds who provide Jewish education for their children.

People who participated in programs or were interested in participating were asked about barriers to participation; interestingly, 17% of inmarrieds listed feeling unwelcome as a barrier, higher than the 7% of intermarrieds who did the same (p 70).

The open-ended comments in the study include (p 145):

Synagogues, while being inclusive, still maintain policies related to marrying couples who include both a Jewish and non-Jewish member that are hurtful and tend to push those couples away. This limits synagogue membership and alienates these folks from the greater Jewish community. – male, 75

When I got married, many years ago, my non-Jewish husband was not welcomed into my family’s synagogue. Things have changed, but I think if he had been, we might have raised my children more in the Jewish faith than his[Christian] church. – female, 56

The study conclusions and recommendations include (p 151): “Evidence from both the quantitative findings shared throughout this report and the qualitative findings shared in Chapter 12 revealed that many intermarried individuals and their families feel uncomfortable and unwelcome in Milwaukee Jewish organizations.”

With respect to research, I missed the Cohen Center’s study of Northeast Florida, and the Cohen Center has recently announced that a synthesis of data from all of their 30 local community studies is now available in their Benchmark Report; I’ll comment on these in a future newsletter.

June 2025 News: Some Israelis Demean Interfaith Marriage; Important Thinking on Inclusion and Belonging; Huma Abedin, Alexander Soros, and an Iranian Princess Intermarry

|

This month’s newsletter is early because I’m traveling the rest of June – we’re taking our grandson for a delayed, post-bar mitzvah trip – you can read about his bar mitzvah here. It was shortly after October 7; it feels like the news in this country and around Israel has been terribly challenging ever since.

Israel, Belonging to the Jewish People, and Interfaith Marriage

The last thing I want to do is anything to distance American Jews from Israel. That’s why it’s sad when prominent Israelis express demeaning attitudes about interfaith marriage specifically and liberal Judaism more generally that can only contribute to that distancing.

Item. This month the Pew Research Center released its Global Religious Landscape study, which includes a section on Jewish population change. The JTA asked “How Many American Jews Are There?” and didn’t address any impact of interfaith marriage, which is fine. But in a Times of Israel story, eminent Israeli demographer Sergio Della Pergola exhibited maddening obliviousness to the realities of interfaith marriage.

He doesn’t explicitly say “interfaith marriage,” but he says, “For about 100 years, assimilation increased steadily. In the US and many European countries, it reached 60%. Essentially, it can’t go higher.” The 2020 Pew report found that 61% of Jews who married between 2010 and 2020 intermarried. It’s clear that Della Pergola is equating interfaith marriage with assimilation.

He does this even though, according to the article, he pointed out “a growing trend of assimilated or partially assimilated Jews reconnecting with their Jewish identity.” In other words, by his own admission, more people in interfaith marriages and their children are identifying as Jewish – the opposite of assimilation.

Worse, he credits antisemitism as the reason, even though the trend of more children of interfaith marriage identifying as Jewish was reported in the 2020 Pew report, long before the recent resurgence in antisemitism.

This kind of gratuitous demeaning of interfaith marriage is tiresome and maddening.

Item. Then there was a story in eJP about a Likud parliamentarian, Galit Distel-Atbaryan, who ejected, from a subcommittee hearing, Gilad Kariv, an Israeli Reform rabbi who is a member of the Knesset. During discussion of an initiative to add Jewish content into school curricula, including allowing time for students to put on tefillin in school, Kariv said the measure should include all students, male and female, noting that one of his daughters puts on tefillin. Distel-Atbaryan reportedly called his comments “provocative,” made a joke about Kariv inviting her “to a bar mitzvah for a dog,” and called the ushers to “get the enlightened Reformi out of here, we Jews wish to continue.”

Thankfully, these remarks sparked outrage from many Israeli leaders. The heads of the Jewish Agency for Israel appropriately said, “Divisive and ignorant remarks like this … weaken our people and the unity of the Jewish People specifically at a time when we more than ever need to be strengthening our ties and bringing our hearts closer together.”

Item. Rabbi Jeffrey Salkin wrote an interesting piece for Religion News Service about the World Zionist Congress election, in which the Reform movement received more votes (about 20% of the total) than any other slate. (The Congress allocates more than $1 billion to Israel and world Jewry.) Slates affiliated with Orthodox Judaism got 40% of the vote, however; Rabbi Salkin notes with “sadness” the discrepancy that 95% of Orthodox Jews feel a strong sense of belonging to the Jewish people, compared to 49% of Reform Jews, and exhorts liberal Jews to repair our ties to our people.

But of course, many Reform Jews are in interfaith relationships, and it’s challenging for people in interfaith relationships to feel a sense of belonging to the Jewish people when prominent people dismiss them as assimilated.

Inclusion Is About Belonging – For All Groups

Meredith Englander Polsky is the co-founder, twenty-five years ago, and now executive director, of Matan, the leading Jewish disability inclusion organization. In an important essay for eJP about the ongoing need for Matan’s work, I loved what she had to say about inclusion of and belonging for all marginalized groups:

Disability inclusion is not separate from other efforts to build an equitable and welcoming Jewish community – it is deeply intertwined with them. Jews with disabilities are also part of the LGBTQ+ community …. They are Jews of Color. They are interfaith families. … When we talk about creating inclusive spaces for one group, we must consider how multiple identities intersect and how exclusion is compounded when we fail to recognize those intersections.

Our tradition teaches that every person is created b’tzelem Elohim, in the image of God. That includes people with disabilities…. And it includes people living at the intersection of multiple marginalized identities. If we believe this, truly believe it, then our institutions must reflect it in every policy, every classroom, every synagogue, every leadership table.

This work is not just about access — it’s about belonging. It’s about ensuring that people … are not merely present in Jewish spaces, but that they are valued, heard, and empowered as essential contributors to our communal life. It’s about recognizing that inclusion is not a destination, but an ongoing process that requires continual reflection, adaptation, and accountability.

Item. eJP had a story about Seth Farber, an Orthodox rabbi, and his organization Itim, which  seeks to facilitate conversions in Israel. One of their initiatives is Shabbat v’Ahavtem, a special Shabbat just before Shavuot, when the story of Ruth, considered to be the first convert, is read. It concerned me, though, that the program refers to the Biblical commandment that appears thirty-six times, which I’ve always understood to mean to “love the stranger,” as instead to mean to “love the convert.”

I’m well aware that the Hebrew word “ger” can be translated as both “convert” and “stranger,” and I’m all for loving converts, but it feels like a misappropriation to say that the commandment is about loving converts. After all, in many of the thirty-six instances is appears, the commandment’s rationale is stated as “for you were strangers in Egypt.”

But the best thing in this story was a quote from Rabbi Adam Scheier of a traditional congregation, Shaar Hashomayim in Montreal, which I thought was so applicable to interfaith families and partners from different faith backgrounds:

When you build a community of closeness, there’s a natural resistance to letting someone from the outside in because it in many ways forces you to reconfigure what your definition of community is. Yet this is emphasized [in the Bible] because that’s exactly what our mandate is: to both build a close-knit community and at the same time always keep doors open and make sure that we’re welcoming to those who come in.

Also in the News

There were two celebrity interfaith marriages in the news this month. Huma Abedin (most known for her work with Hillary Clinton) and Alexander Soros had an “intimate, interfaith ceremony” officiated by Rabbi Darren Levine with a Muslim life cycle celebrant participating and a “roster of A-list Democrats … in attendance.” Princess Iman Pahlavi married American businessman Bradley Sherman, who became the first ever Jewish member of the exiled Iranian royal family.

Interfaith Family Inclusion at the Jewish Belonging Summit, Boston Globe, Canadian Podcast and eJP

|

Jewish Belonging Summit

Amid the horrible news this month, I was glad to participate in the first Jewish Belonging Summit sponsored by the JFNA’s Center for Jewish Belonging and the SRE Network.  The Center’s Rabbi Isaiah Rothstein and SRE’s Rachel Gildiner were interviewed by eJP before the summit and afterwards wrote “Belonging cannot wait” for eJP.

I met many very interesting people and there were many interesting discussions. The summit captured how plenary participants’ defined “belonging.” I wondered how Rabbi Sandra Lawson’s definition – that “we are called to create community where no one has to leave out parts of themselves” – would apply to interfaith couples and partners from different faith backgrounds.

At a workshop that discussed survey data about the “surge” of Jewish engagement post-October 23, I heard a phrase that was new to me: “historically disadvantaged” groups, referring to LGBTQ+ Jews, Jews of color, and “mixed heritage” Jews. The overall point made was that while “belonging is critical to building flourishing communities,” historically disadvantaged groups find meaning in Jewish life personally but not in their larger communities.

I didn’t feel enough was said about inclusion of interfaith families and partners from different faith backgrounds. At the opening plenary, 18Doors’ Adam Pollack told a personal story about how he was told fifteen years ago that having such a partner was not a good model for a Jewish professional, and how 18Doors now helps people in interfaith relationships. That was the only mention of interfaith family inclusion I heard at the plenaries.

There were some passing references. Rabbi Rothstein usually referred to “Jews and their loved ones.” Schusterman’s Lisa Eisen said, “You’re welcome and belong here, whether you’re Jewish or not.” But most of the discussion was about inclusion of LGBTQ+ Jews and Jews of Color.

I am totally in favor of LGBTQ+ and Jews of Color inclusion, which is extremely important. But Jews who are in interfaith relationships vastly outnumber those who are LGBTQ+ or of Color.

There is also tremendous intersectionality between these groups. Just before the summit, Bruce Phillips provided me with information he had drawn from the 2020 Pew report data: 77% of gay or lesbian Jews and 80% of Jews of Color have a spouse or partner who is not Jewish (compared to 43% of straight Jews and 43% of white Jews). By comparison, only 5% of gay or lesbian Jews are Jews of Color (another 3.5% are Hispanic), and only 4.7% of Jews of Color (and 4.9% of Hispanic Jews) are gay or lesbian.

In his comments at the opening plenary, Adam Pollack mentioned that he saw “so many partners” at the summit. But over many years, despite the very high proportion of interfaith relationships, I haven’t heard advocates for LGBTQ+ inclusion or Jews of Color inclusion say much about interfaith family inclusion. I didn’t hear that at the summit either.

Keshet recently released “Threads of Identity,” a report on “the unique experiences, challenges, and resilience of LGBTQ+ Jews of Color in Jewish spaces.” They find that “a lack of support, representation, and biases from fellow Jewish community members often lead to feelings of isolation, exclusion, and the need to compartmentalize aspects of their identity” and call for Jewish spaces to be more inclusive of their unique needs. I would love to see reports on LGBTQ+ Jews and Jews of Color in interfaith relationships.

I hope that there will be future summits, where there will be more airtime for interfaith family inclusion, in deep collaboration with all other historically disadvantaged groups.

Wrong Ideas About Interfaith Marriage and Demographic Loss

The Boston Globe published a story about a Massachusetts synagogue in which a gratuitous comment seemed to partly blame intermarriage for its closing. I wrote the following letter to the editor (it’s behind a paywall):

In his moving essay about the closing of the synagogue where generations of his family had gone, Larry Tye writes, “Intermarriage rates are climbing, but more slowly, and rates of conversion are rising.”

The Pew Research Center’s report, “Jewish Americans in 2020,” found that “the offspring of intermarriages have become increasingly likely to identify as Jewish in adulthood.” Len Saxe, who leads the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies at Brandeis, has suggested that that is one of the most important reasons that the Jewish population in the United States is increasing.

A Jewish Telegraphic Agency story in 2021 concluded, “Intermarriage, rather than acting as a net negative for Jewish population, actually has resulted in more Jews.”

Globe readers should understand that welcoming and including interfaith families is key to the ongoing growth and thriving of American Jewish communities.

The false idea of demographic loss also came up in a short podcast, “1 in 3 Canadian Jews have a non-Jewish spouse. What does that mean for the country’s Jewish future?” A new study of Canadian Jews found that “intermarriage is no longer as rare as it used to be in Canada, with 30 percent of Canadian Jews marrying outside their faith.” The podcast introduction reads:

So what do we make of this? Doomsayers have called intermarriage a “second Holocaust”, but the unavoidable reality of young people moving away from religion can’t be fought. Should Jewish institutions and community leaders expand their outreach, or do they tighten their grip on what it means to be a Jew?

Phoebe Maltz Bovy asked how much of the negativity about interfaith marriage was because of concerns over continuity, and how much about religion. She said the demographic concern, that interfaith marriage means fewer Jews, “might not be the thing.” Matthew Leibl, a rabbi in Winnipeg who officiates at weddings of interfaith couples, agreed. He said he uses the term “dual faith” because “interfaith” and “intermarriage” have such negative connotations. Leibl also offered what he called an “easy fix” for the religious concern – to recognize patrilineal descent – an important idea, but not so easy to implement.

Ignoring the Partners 

Finally, in time for Shavuot, Rabbi Jeffrey Salkin and Sandra Lilienthal offer “The Jewish People stood together at Sinai. Can we today?” It’s a nice emphasis on pluralism and plea for unity, but a missed opportunity to explicitly acknowledge and embrace interfaith families and partners from different faith backgrounds.

The authors surely know that a “mixed multitude” (Exodus 12:38) left Egypt with the Israelites and was present at Mount Sinai when the Torah was received. But their essay only says, “Every Jew past, present and future and everyone who would someday become a Jew was present at Sinai” and “the entire Jewish people was present for the same revelation.”

If they meant to include, in “the entire Jewish people,” Jews and their loved ones, that would have been a very welcome Shavuot message.

December 2023 News from the Center

|

Most of the Jewish world’s attention is still focused – appropriately I would say – on what’s happening in Israel. But it feels right to start reporting and commenting on interfaith inclusion news again. Especially since December is always a big month for interfaith families.

December Holidays

The UK Institute for Jewish Policy Research issued a new study that found that 28% of Jews in the UK have a Christmas tree at least some years. For interfaith couples, it’s 45% every year, compared to 36% who light Hanukkah candles. I appreciated that the JPR referred to Christmas trees as a “cultural manifestation.”

Most important, the JPR, which is a pretty traditional organization, did not criticize or bemoan the presence of Christmas trees, but instead calmly concluded that the findings “capture both the tenacity of Jewishness today and the realities of Jewish life in the modern multicultural age… Maintaining a Jewish identity in a non-Jewish society has long been a challenge; the ways in which we adopt non-Jewish customs and practices says a great deal about who we are and how we manage those dynamics.” (The Jewish News article on the report had a catchy title – “Oy to the World” – and refers to “ChristmasTreeGate” – but ultimately quotes the same conclusion.)

I read a few stories in Jewish and secular media about how interfaith families were celebrating the December holidays, but didn’t really notice anything new. The Reform movement’s website had some nice and very accepting advice in Five Ways to Approach Family Conversations Around Hanukkah and Christmas.

There was one story I didn’t care for, “I packed away Christmas 35 years ago, but I still bring holiday joy to others.” Janet Silver Ghent grew up in a Jewish family that celebrated Christmas, then married and divorced a man who was not Jewish, then married a Jewish man who had been in an interfaith marriage; at that point she gave up Christmas because she “reclaimed [her] Jewish identity after decades of assimilation.” She told a step-daughter, who asked why they couldn’t have a little tree, “a little tree is like a little pregnant.”

Ghent’s story stood out to me for a tone that is critical of Jewish families that celebrate Christmas, something I did not see much of elsewhere this December. Assimilation means losing Jewish identity and practice; it seems that more and more people in the Jewish world understand that having a Christmas tree does not mean that an interfaith family has assimilated.

Attitudes about Interfaith Marriage

The Shalom Hartman Institute and its co-president Donniel Hartman, an Orthodox rabbi, are deservedly among the most highly-regarded Jewish educational institutions and leaders in the world. When someone of Rabbi Hartman’s stature speaks about engaging interfaith families positively, it’s amazing, a cause for celebration.

In his new book, Who Are The Jews – And Who Can We Become, Hartman refers to “non-assimilationist exogamy;” says “most North American Jews who marry non-Jews do not see selves as rejecting Jewishness;” says interfaith marriage “can no longer be a boundary that defines Jewishness – it is now the norm of Jewish life;” talks about expanding “the parameters of Jewish identity” and “the inclusion of intermarried Jews and their spouses who chose to join us;” and recommends, “rather than digging our heels into a self-defeating discourse of denial, we marshal our collective creativity to ensure a vital next chapter in the Jewish people’s story.” This was all music to my ears.

I was equally amazed when the institute’s US-based co-president, Yehuda Kurtzer, another top Jewish public intellectual, in an opinion about the reshaping of the American Zionist left after October 7, said,  “[T]he big tent should be inclusive of anyone seeking to belong. One fascinating outcome of this could mean that we stop the decadeslong obsession with intermarriage as the marker of Jewish peoplehood. After Oct. 7, identification with the Jewish people at a time of suffering is a much healthier, and maybe more accurate, indicator of belonging.”

Speaking of top intellectual leaders, I was very saddened by the death of Rabbi David Ellenson, the much beloved past president of Hebrew Union College. As explained in my remembrance, he had the most remarkable generosity of spirit of anyone I ever met. Although I publicly criticized his decision to maintain HUC’s policy not to admit rabbinic students in interfaith relationships, he became a supporter and a friend,  publicly endorsing InterfaithFamily’s work several times, speaking at the afternoon of learning when I retired from InterfaithFamily, and providing the cover endorsement for my book. He never said this to me, but I can only imagine that he felt our policy differences were disputes for the sake of heaven.

Research

The Cohen Center at Brandeis released the 2022 San Diego Jewish Community Study. In San Diego, 49% of married Jewish individuals are intermarried, and 67% of couples that include a Jewish person are intermarried; in intermarried households, 55% of children are considered by their parents to be Jewish, and another 20% are considered to be Jewish and another religion. During 2024 I hope to complete my analysis of the Cohen Center’s recent local community studies.

I am excited about the prospects of a new study, funded by the Crown Family, Harold Grinspoon and Jim Joseph foundations. The study by Rosov Consulting and led by Alex Pomson will explore “the interests, needs, hopes, and challenges of a wide diversity of Jewish families, including those with more than one religious or cultural tradition…” They will examine which elements of the parents’ heritages they wish to continue, which they have chosen not to, and why.

The first part of the study is a just-released review of research which clearly notes that welcoming Jewish attitudes and institutions make a difference. I appreciated the review’s statement that the last decade’s research “dispels the still-common tropes in communal discourse about the ‘dangers’ [interfaith families] pose to Jewish continuity.” I appreciated the recognition that structural factors, including institutional policies and ideologies, impact on couples’ decision. For interfaith families, that means experiencing pressure to convert, encountering attitudes and policies that privilege matrilineal descent, and hearing interfaith marriage characterized as a problem. I appreciated the review’s noting that for LGBTQ+ couples who are also interfaith, “many of the Christian partners were more favorably inclined toward Judaism because they viewed the Jewish community as more welcoming of LGBTQ+ people.”

I liked what the review said about terminology:

[W]e use the term “interfaith” to refer to all couples and their families in which one partner is Jewish (in some way) and the other is from a different religious, cultural or ethnic background, including those in which one partner has converted to Judaism, those in which each partner adheres to a different faith tradition, and those who do not consider themselves to be religious. All such families face similar challenges in negotiating which elements of the parents’ childhood heritage to perpetuate or discard.

Finally, coming full circle back to December, the review also notes the negative influence of Jews choosing to “code” Christmas traditions as “religious” and not “cultural,” and “therefore incompatible with a Jewish home, even though … arguably devoid of strictly religious meaning for many who engage in them.”

I find all of this very promising, and look forward to further reports as the study takes shape.

* * * * * *

At this difficult time, I hope your December holidays were as good as they could be, and I send sincere wishes for a good and better new year.

Embrace Gay Married Jews But Not Intermarried Jews? I Don’t Think So

|

There is a pretty offensive article on the Forward today, Why Intermarriage Poses Threat to Jewish Life – But Gay Marriage Doesn’t. It’s by Yoel Finkelman, a lecturer at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, and like most Israeli commentators, he doesn’t understand liberal Jewish life and community in the US.

Finkelman says that liberal American Jewry has a lot to gain from embracing LGBT married Jews, but that embracing intermarried Jews is an “uphill climb” that will “depend on a huge investment” that he clearly thinks is not worth making.

This analysis is misguided on many levels, but what immediately comes to mind is the very small numbers of people who would be impacted by embracing LGBT married Jews. Please don’t get me wrong, I’m all in favor of including LGBT Jews – and their partners – in Jewish life and community. But it is well known (perhaps not to Finkelman) that the rate of interfaith relationships is much higher among LGBT Jews than among straight Jews. The 2011 New York community study, for example, found (at 249) that while 22% of married Jews there were intermarried, 44% of LGBT married Jews were intermarried.

These wedge-driving arguments are really troublesome; many lay Jews are already upset with rabbis who will not officiate for interfaith couples but will officiate for LGBT couples if both partners are Jewish. I can’t imagine that advocates of Jewish LGBT inclusion would agree with Finkelman’s analysis and encourage more attention to the LGBT community at the expense of efforts to engage the intermarried. There has to be room in our communal efforts to do both.

This post originally appeared on www.interfaithfamily.com and is reprinted with permission.

Happy and Proud

|

People who know me know that I am rarely satisfied. When something really positive happens, I am usually immediately thinking of what more could be done.

But I want to pause and say that I am as happy and proud as I could be that InterfaithFamily.com is playing a role in what is being described as the first, legal, gay marriage in New York. I have a lot of personal feelings about this that I want to share.

There was controversy when we started our Resource Center for Jewish Clergy and our Jewish Clergy Officiation Referral Service. People said we would badger rabbis to officiate for interfaith couples – something we have never done. I felt to a certainty that helping interfaith couples have a positive experience finding a rabbi to officiate or co-officiate at their weddings – something we have consistently done, at a current rate of 175 couples a month – would be a positive factor towards future Jewish engagement of those couples. I’m convinced it was the smartest move our organization ever made.

Ten years ago when IFF was founded I confess that I wasn’t sure how I felt about gay marriage. Then I got to know Sue Edelman and I got to know Rabbi Lev Baesh and thankfully it became a no-brainer to me that same-sex couples deserve marriage equality. I also learned that most people say that even more LGBT than straight relationships involving Jews are also interfaith relationships, and we have always published content aimed at supporting gay interfaith relationships (check out our new LGBT Resource Page), and that was clearly the right thing to do too.

A year ago I made a presentation to the Jewish Federation of North America’s planners group with my friend Idit Klein, the executive director of the leading Jewish LGBT advocacy organization, Keshet. Idit and I had a friendly debate about whether LGBT Jews or Jews in interfaith relationships were more marginalized in the Jewish community. You could say that IFF’s over-arching goal is to not have interfaith couples marginalized in the Jewish community. If IFF can help gay interfaith couples overcome the extra hurdles they face, so much the better.

Last Wednesday when I saw Dee Smith’s officiation referral request and read that they were going to be the first gay couple married in New York I went running out of my office with excitement. We quickly put Lev, who directs our Resource Center for Jewish Clergy, in touch with the couple. We thought he would be the perfect rabbi for the couple and that they would love him, they apparently did, and I am thrilled for Lev that he will be having a role in making history on July 24.

The big deal here is that there is going to be legal gay marriage in New York. I was proud to live in Massachusetts when our state legalized gay marriage, I was proud when my childhood friend Richard Palmer wrote the Connecticut Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage in that state, and I was disappointed when the electorate in Maine where I spend a lot of time voted against it. I hope that New York has turned the tide in favor of marriage equality.

But it is also a big deal for the Jewish community that the first legal gay marriage in New York involves an interfaith couple who sought to have a rabbi officiate at their wedding. And I am very happy and proud that our organization was available and able to make that happen.

This post originally appeared on www.interfaithfamily.com and is reprinted with permission.

Do Not Stand Idly By

|

For the past several years I have tried to keep my family out of my professional work in order to respect their privacy. Today I’m going to deviate a little from that rule.

Two weeks ago one of the happiest occasions in my life took place in my home: the bris of my first grandchild. A grandchild is a wondrous creature — I keep saying that he is like an entire universe of possibilities, and we have no idea how they will play out.

While I was making a few remarks at the bris, I noticed a young adult guest starting to cry. She came up to me afterwards and said that as a lesbian she had been overcome by my choice of pronouns in my remarks. All I had said was the following to my son-in-law and daughter: “We just said a prayer that we hoped that Jonah had huppah, a loving partner, in his life. I hope that 25 or 30 years from now the two of you are talking to each other about who Jonah is going out with, do you like the person, is the person good for him, is the person ‘the one.’”

It would have been easy for me to have said “is she the one,” and I did chose my words carefully, but I was quite taken aback that what I said had such an impact. It left me wondering how many times the young woman had experienced expressed assumptions of sexual preference that left her feeling different and disfavored.

I tell you this because I wonder whether casual expressions of assumed heterosexuality lead directly to the homophobia playing out in the news. You may have heard that a Jewish newspaper, the Jewish Standard, printed an announcement of a same sex wedding, then apologized after members of the Orthodox community objected, then kind of retracted the apology when others objected to it. Our friend David Levy has been blogging about that at Jewschool, which also has a follow up story.

Much more tragic is the recent spate of teen suicides due to homophobic bullying. I am very proud that InterfaithFamily.com is a co-sponsor of Do Not Stand Idly By: A Jewish Community Pledge to Save Lives originated by our friends at Keshet. The pledge states a commitment to end homophobic bullying or harassment, to speak out when anyone is being demeaned due to sexual orientation or gender identity, and to treat every person with dignity and respect. You can sign the pledge on Keshet’s website. I hope that you will. if the commitment becomes more of a reality, my little grandson’s world will be that much of a repaired place.

This post originally appeared on www.interfaithfamily.com and is reprinted with permission.